|
|
Post by MXB on Apr 21, 2007 20:34:39 GMT -5
The victime, Robin Dennis was found clutching blonde hair which did not belong to Maurice Mason who is an African-American with nappy black hair.
Why were no DNA tests performed on this hair? And why has this vital piece of evidence been ignored?
MXB
|
|
|
|
Post by sixteefoor on May 19, 2007 1:10:45 GMT -5
Well now, this is interesting...and what's with Maurice's attorneys that they have let this slide by? Just out of curiosity what color hair did the husband have?
|
|
|
|
Post by konichiwa on May 20, 2007 3:19:11 GMT -5
So terrible to ignore vital evidence. What can be done?
|
|
|
|
Post by peterp on May 21, 2007 5:40:06 GMT -5
In Part 5 of Maurice Mason's case information we see that the husband Chris Dennis had long blond hair, sixteefour.
|
|
|
|
Post by quirkyquasar on May 22, 2007 2:51:18 GMT -5
Was he investigated too?
|
|
|
|
Post by konichiwa on Jul 1, 2007 9:26:02 GMT -5
Very interesting information, why was this neglected?
|
|
|
|
Post by gellibee on Aug 5, 2007 0:20:26 GMT -5
I just do not understand how such vital evidence could have been ignored at trial, and is still being ignored now. Maybe we should petition Reese's lawyers to do something about this.
|
|
gypsy
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by gypsy on Aug 5, 2007 21:05:39 GMT -5
This is incredible. Why isn't something being done?
|
|
|
|
Post by cinnamoncookie on Dec 9, 2007 7:26:11 GMT -5
This is so bad and wrong and I know Reese all my life and he didn't do this.
|
|
